Previously Posted: Homeless not hopeless

For those new to CabbieBlog or readers who are slightly forgetful, on Saturdays I’m republishing posts, many going back over a decade. Some will still be very relevant while others have become dated over time. Just think of this post as your weekend paper supplement.

Homeless not hopeless (10.08.2010)

While driving through Hackney recently I came across this group of social deprivation warriors, and like or loath them if properties weren’t left empty by landlords or disgracefully unoccupied by local councils, squatters (who often have not broken any laws) would not exist.

On closer inspection I was surprised to find this once elegant early Victorian detached house had a plaque attached to its gatepost “The Elizabeth Fry Refuge 1849-1913”. The irony of squatters living in Elizabeth Fry’s Refuge has obviously escaped Hackney Council’s attention.

Born in Norwich on 21st May 1780 Elizabeth was the daughter of John Gurney a partner in the famous Gurney Bank, her mother was a member of the Barclay banking family and a devout Quaker, helping the poor of the district every day. As a young woman her friend was Amelia Alderson whose father was a member of the Corresponding Society Group advocating universal suffrage and annual parliaments.

In July 1799 she was introduced to a fellow Quaker, Joseph Fry a successful merchant’s son. They married the following year move to Plashet (now East Ham in London) and she bore him eight children.

In 1813 a friend of the Fry family, Stephen Grellet, visited Newgate Prison. Grellet was deeply shocked by what he saw but was informed that the conditions in the women’s section were even worse. When Grellet asked to see this part of the prison, he was advised against entering the women’s yard as they were so unruly they would probably do him some physical harm. Grellet insisted and was appalled by the suffering that he saw.

When Grellet told Elizabeth about the way women were treated in Newgate, she decided that she must visit the prison. There she discovered 300 women and their children, huddled together in two wards and two cells, the female prisoners slept on the floor without nightclothes or bedding. Although some of the women had been found guilty of crimes, others were still waiting to be tried.

Elizabeth began to visit the women of Newgate Prison, supplying those clothes and establishing a school, and later with other Quakers formed the Association for the Improvement of the Female Prisoners at Newgate. Her brother-in-law published an inquiry into prison discipline and upon being elected as an Member of Parliament, he addressed Parliament and pointed out that there were 107,000 people in British prisons, greater than all the other prisoners in Europe put together – it is also a greater number than in today’s prisons.

Elizabeth gave evidence to a House of Commons Committee, describing how Newgate held 30 prisoners to a room each prisoner had a space of 6 feet by 2 feet, with hardened offenders sharing rooms with first time offences. At a time when over 200 offences were capital offences she declared “capital punishment was evil and produce evil results”.

When Sir Robert Peel became Home Secretary he introduced a series of reforms directed at introducing more humane treatment of prisoners as a result of pressure from Elizabeth.

Elizabeth also became concerned about the quality of nursing staff. In 1840 she started a training school for nurses in Guy’s Hospital and Florence Nightingale wrote to Fry to explain how she had been influenced by her views on the training of nurses. Later, when Nightingale went to the Crimean War, she took a group of Fry nurses with her to look after the sick and wounded soldiers.

It is claimed that Queen Victoria, who was forty years younger than Elizabeth Fry, might have modelled herself on this woman who successfully combined the roles of mother and public figure.

Although prison reform was her main concern she also campaigned for the homeless in London. So when you have a £5 note in your hand turn it over, there you will find Elizabeth Fry, Quaker, prison reformer, campaigner for universal suffrage and champion of the poor and homeless, it’s just a pity that Hackney Council don’t try their best to follow her lead.

Test Your Knowledge: September 2023

Who lives here? This month’s quiz is about which famous people live or once lived at the following London addresses. As before the correct answer will turn green when it’s clicked upon and expanded to give more information. The incorrect answers will turn red giving the correct explanation.

1. 48 Doughty Street?
Virginia Woolfe
WRONG This typical Georgian terraced house near King’s Cross was Charles Dickens’s home from 25 March 1837 (a year after his marriage) to December 1839.
Charles Dickens
CORRECT This typical Georgian terraced house near King’s Cross was Charles Dickens’s home from 25 March 1837 (a year after his marriage) to December 1839.
Mary Shelley
WRONG This typical Georgian terraced house near King’s Cross was Charles Dickens’s home from 25 March 1837 (a year after his marriage) to December 1839.
2. 87 Hackford Road?
William Hogarth
WRONG Van Gogh lodged briefly at the home of Ursula Loyer and her daughter Eugenie at 87 Hackford Road, Stockwell from August 1873 while working at the art dealership Goupil & Co. He sketched the 1824-built, three-storey Georgian terrace opposite Durand School, using pencil with chalk highlights.
Vincent van Gogh
CORRECT Van Gogh lodged briefly at the home of Ursula Loyer and her daughter Eugenie at 87 Hackford Road, Stockwell from August 1873 while working at the art dealership Goupil & Co. He sketched the 1824-built, three-storey Georgian terrace opposite Durand School, using pencil with chalk highlights.
J.M.W. Turner
WRONG Van Gogh lodged briefly at the home of Ursula Loyer and her daughter Eugenie at 87 Hackford Road, Stockwell from August 1873 while working at the art dealership Goupil & Co. He sketched the 1824-built, three-storey Georgian terrace opposite Durand School, using pencil with chalk highlights.
3. 36 Craven Street?
Benjamin Franklin
CORRECT This terraced Georgian house close to Trafalgar Square is the last-standing former residence of Benjamin Franklin, one of the Founding Fathers of the United States. The house dates from 1730, and Franklin lived and worked there for sixteen years.
Tim Berners-Lee
WRONG This terraced Georgian house close to Trafalgar Square is the last-standing former residence of Benjamin Franklin, one of the Founding Fathers of the United States. The house dates from 1730, and Franklin lived and worked there for sixteen years.
David Attenborough
WRONG This terraced Georgian house close to Trafalgar Square is the last-standing former residence of Benjamin Franklin, one of the Founding Fathers of the United States. The house dates from 1730, and Franklin lived and worked there for sixteen years.
4. 32 Windsor Gardens?
Paddington Bear
CORRECT The Brown’s fictional house in Windsor Gardens is actually Chalcot Crescent in Primrose Hill.
Uncle Bulgaria
WRONG The Brown’s fictional house in Windsor Gardens is actually Chalcot Crescent in Primrose Hill.
Bungle
WRONG The Brown’s fictional house in Windsor Gardens is actually Chalcot Crescent in Primrose Hill.
5. 31 Melbury Road?
Robbie Williams
CORRECT Built-in 1875, it was designed by architect Richard Norman Shaw. Once the home of director Michael Winner, it was purchased in 2013 by Robbie Williams. The house currently has 47 rooms and over 2,000 light bulbs – the house was originally intended for artists’ studios, needing to use ample light and skylights for the entrance of natural light.
Gary Oldman
WRONG Built-in 1875, it was designed by architect Richard Norman Shaw. Once the home of director Michael Winner, it was purchased in 2013 by Robbie Williams. The house currently has 47 rooms and over 2,000 light bulbs – the house was originally intended for artists’ studios, needing to use ample light and skylights for the entrance of natural light.
Marc Bolan
WRONG Built-in 1875, it was designed by architect Richard Norman Shaw. Once the home of director Michael Winner, it was purchased in 2013 by Robbie Williams. The house currently has 47 rooms and over 2,000 light bulbs – the house was originally intended for artists’ studios, needing to use ample light and skylights for the entrance of natural light.
6. 30 Camden Square?
Adele
WRONG The late, extremely talented singer resided at 30 Camden Square, the spot where she died of alcohol poisoning. The house has since become a shrine for fans, who want to pay respects.
Amy Winehouse
CORRECT The late, extremely talented singer resided at 30 Camden Square, the spot where she died of alcohol poisoning. The house has since become a shrine for fans, who want to pay respects.
Dua Lipa
WRONG The late, extremely talented singer resided at 30 Camden Square, the spot where she died of alcohol poisoning. The house has since become a shrine for fans, who want to pay respects.
7. 7 Cavendish Avenue?
David Bowie
WRONG Hidden behind high wooden doors, this house in St John Wood is nestled among mainly large mansions, and massive old trees and the streets are very quiet. A few other celebs that call St John Wood home are actor Ewan McGregor and pop star Lily Allen.
Gary Barlow
WRONG Hidden behind high wooden doors, this house in St John Wood is nestled among mainly large mansions, and massive old trees and the streets are very quiet. A few other celebs that call St John Wood home are actor Ewan McGregor and pop star Lily Allen.
Sir Paul McCartney
CORRECT Hidden behind high wooden doors, this house in St John Wood is nestled among mainly large mansions, and massive old trees and the streets are very quiet. A few other celebs that call St John Wood home are actor Ewan McGregor and pop star Lily Allen.
8. 23 Holland Park?
Bobby Moore
WRONG Did the Beckhams have to pay more to get David Beckham’s jersey number 23 as their home address rest assured they could afford it.
Lennox Lewis
WRONG Did the Beckhams have to pay more to get David Beckham’s jersey number 23 as their home address rest assured they could afford it.
David Beckham
CORRECT Did the Beckhams have to pay more to get David Beckham’s jersey number 23 as their home address rest assured they could afford it.
9. 4 Queensdale Place?
Elton John
CORRECT Elton has owned this modest house since 1992. He also has a much grander home in Windsor.
Keith Moon
WRONG Elton has owned this modest house since 1992. He also has a much grander home in Windsor.
Elvis Costello
WRONG Elton has owned this modest house since 1992. He also has a much grander home in Windsor.
10. 28 Logan Place?
John Lydon
WRONG Over 20 years after Mercury died of AIDS fans still come to his house Garden Lodge to pay tribute by leaving flowers and personal letters on the perimeter wall.
Freddie Mercury
CORRECT Over 20 years after Mercury died of AIDS fans still come to his house Garden Lodge to pay tribute by leaving flowers and personal letters on the perimeter wall.
Ian Dury
WRONG Over 20 years after Mercury died of AIDS fans still come to his house Garden Lodge to pay tribute by leaving flowers and personal letters on the perimeter wall.

Swimming in bureaucracy

My son ever anxious that my sedentary lifestyle will get the better of me (I keep reminding him that Jim Fixx who wrote an early best-selling book about running, ironically died of a heart attack at the age of 52 years whilst running), enrolled me at the local swimming pool. We oldies get ‘free swims’. The problem you need an enrolment card, an app to book installed on your phone (gone are the days of just turning up), a photo id and proof of paying local council rates. On the first attempt at a swim, I arrived to find the pool closed and they had phoned to tell me only 8 minutes before I was due to arrive. Now I’m finding that to use the other swimming pools in the borough I’ll have to register at each with id and proof of council tax. Gone are the days of just turning up at Wood Green’s pool in the 50s and proffering 6d. That was much too simple.

Johnson’s London Dictionary: Chelsea bun

CHELSEA BUN (n.) Baked confection is named after an area of London devoid of costermongers marketing this sticky substance.

Dr. Johnson’s London Dictionary for publick consumption in the twenty-first century avail yourself on Twitter @JohnsonsLondon

ULEZ has arrived

After much hype by the Mayor’s office and objections by many, including low-paid shift workers, ULEZ has finally arrived with its Big Brother cameras now covering Greater London.

So let’s go through the arguments, first the scheme’s supporters:

• I don’t care because I don’t have a car.
• If I had a car it would probably be compliant anyway, most are.
• The new ULEZ zone will be the existing LEZ zone… which doesn’t quite cover the whole of London, so you’ll still be able to belch around Chingford or sputter along Farthing Downs to your heart’s content.
• Trying to gather accurate data on the existing ULEZ has been skewed by the pandemic, fuel shortages and the soaring cost of petrol, making conclusions harder to draw.
• Currently only 6 per cent of vehicles driving in the ULEZ are non-compliant, so only a small number of people are about to be shafted (but it’s 17 per cent of vans, so expect White Van Men to be angriest).
• The mayor’s office estimates that only an additional 135,000 vehicles a day will be affected by the extension of the ULEZ. For comparison, on an average day, London residents make 6 million journeys by car.
• If you drive daily then £12.50 a day is £4,500 a year. You could buy a replacement vehicle for that (which is probably the point).
• Londoners receiving certain means-tested benefits and disability benefits can apply for grants of up to £2,000 to scrap their non-compliant cars or motorcycles, so it’s not the cruel draconian scheme it could be.
• It’s not hard to get Londoners breathing ‘cleaner air’, even removing one car does that. What’s hard is making a significant difference.
• Brilliant, bring it on, the fewer polluting cars the better.

…and the arguments against:

• It’s ghastly that air pollution contributed to the death of that child the Mayor’s always going on about, but cars hitting things kill far more people.
• If ‘air pollution is making us sick from cradle to the grave’, then I have 76 years of breathing I ought to be able to sue someone for.
• If I genuinely wanted to reduce my exposure to toxic air the simplest solution would be to move out of London.
• The mitigation regarding ‘the biggest ever expansion of the bus network in outer London’ is mostly spin because hardly anyone’s going to live in the right place to make use of them. e.g. the first example on the list is ‘improved links between Harold Hill and Upminster’, a journey currently made by London’s least frequent bus, so nobody needs that.
• In Havering, where I live, no trains, no black cabs driving down our street, and all bus routes go in the same direction.
• The Mayor’s new scrappage scheme will include the option to get two annual bus passes, which at £464 a year isn’t exactly generous.
• Anyone who sends moaning letters to local newspapers saying “it’s just another Khan tax on the motorist, we need to remove all the bus lanes instead” should be forced to pay £12.50 anyway, as a cabbie that’s my opinion.
• If air pollution is as ghastly as the Mayor now claims, why has he taken seven years to implement this?
• If I had a non-compliant vehicle I’d be absolutely pissed off by the prospect of a £12.50 daily charge or forking out for a new vehicle during a cost-of-living crisis.
• Most households in the current ULEZ don’t have a car but most households in the extension do, so this is going to be a lot less popular.
• It’s not exactly surprising that ‘there are more deaths attributed to toxic air in the city’s outer boroughs’ because 1½ million more people live there.
• The M11 and M25 aren’t included but the M1 and the M4 are, plus you’ll be charged if you try to drive into Heathrow.
• I wonder how many one-off visitors to London are going to find themselves stung by an unexpected £180 fine.
• The first ULEZ expansion was announced with over a year’s notice, this one’s had only nine months.
• Just how are low-paid shift workers going to get home during the night?
• With most cars being replaced before they’re 10 years old, it wouldn’t have taken long before we were all-electric, without ULEZ’s additional costs.
• Surely more pollution will be created by scrapping millions of cars, but as this will occur away from London, I suppose that’s the point.
• If the Mayor want to display his green credentials, why hasn’t he allowed serviceable black cabs to be converted by Clipper Cabs to electric?

Taxi Talk Without Tipping