Previously Posted: I’m incandescent with rage

For those new to CabbieBlog or readers who are slightly forgetful, on Saturdays I’m republishing posts, many going back over a decade. Some will still be very relevant while others have become dated over time. Just think of this post as your weekend paper supplement.

I’m incandescent with rage (18.01.11)

When the motor car was originally invented it was little more than its predecessor, the horse drawn carriage. The light for this new contraption were acetylene lamps, with just enough light to indicate its presence , travelling at walking pace, slower than most vehicle on the road, this weak light was all that was necessary. The earliest headlamps were fuelled by acetylene or oil and were introduced in the late 1880s, among the earliest inventions were the “Prest-O-Lite” acetylene lamps that were popular because the flame was resistant to wind and rain. The first electric headlamps were introduced in 1898 on the Columbia Electric Car from the Electric Vehicle Company of Hartford, Connecticut, but the manufacturers regarded them as superfluous so made them optional extras. Two factors limited the widespread use of electric headlamps: the short life of filaments in the harsh automotive environment, and the difficulty of producing dynamos small enough, yet powerful enough to produce sufficient current.

As cars developed into a shape we would recognise today, and with speeds attaining the dizzy heights of 50mph Thomas Edison’s incandescent light bulbs were necessary for drivers to see and be seen. This lasted until the advent of Ward War II made it necessary for vehicles to take to the road with the barest minimum of illumination but as there were hardly any other vehicles around; the biggest danger was falling down a bomb crater.

From the 1950’s car development has moved on apace, and with it so have vehicles’ headlights. First fog lights were added which, if the manufacturer’s claims were to be believed, would cut a swath through fog with their ethereal yellow beam. A further development was for moving away from the parabolic mirror to a more efficient reflecting shape giving a better and more focussed beam.

For the manufacturers of the prestigious Marques, the humble beam of Edison’s humble bulb was not sufficiently impressive for their discerning (or if you prefer – exhibitionist) customers, and so a brighter light had to be found. As if with perfect timing the HID (high-intensity discharge) Xenon/Bi-Xenon car headlights dropped into their laps at just the time the world was agonizing over global warming. What luck! A high intensity light that shows off the owner’s wealth and his green credentials at the same time. These headlights not only save on the watts, but also light up the streets way better for the driver, but not it has to be said for anyone approaching the vehicle.

Now doctors are becoming aware that the bright and extra headlights are causing stress and many other road users would like to see some action taken to reduce this unnecessary glare. It has been suggested that being confronted with a bright distracting light triggers a fight or flight response, with the result that high blood pressure, stress and blood sugars increase, not to mention the added risk of eye disease.

Unnecessary distracting and blinding lights are a hazard and that you will actually be doing the manufactures a favour by nipping this in the bud soon, as they could be liable for the damage that is resulting from this, to take a blind eye (no pun intended) to this is not only negligent but criminal. The eye is the most sensitive of all our senses; it is easily damaged as well as the most easily distracted. All this extra lighting is causing accidents, not preventing them, many people seem to agree about this issue and I have yet to speak to a single person who was in favour of these lights, although no discussion has yet taken place with a 4×4 driver.

The brightness is made worst as these high intensity lights are fitted on high vehicles whose headlight are at the same height as other driver’s eyes. In addition we now we have a situation that every wannabe boy racer’s car has been installed with these HID lights as well, modifying their current headlights, and driving with HID fog lights to supplement their headlights. All to attain that oh so cool blueish/whitish glow, or to tell their fellow drivers that they’re blind.

The only proper and indeed ethical course of action is to regulate now.

London’s oldest map

Not long ago there was a craze for colouring books, not the one for young children, but for adults. Many of those books now seem to have left the shelves of bookshops, I suppose Covid lockdown saw to that, there must be just so many swirls you can colour in.

Recently, taking this idea to a whole new level has been a project undertaken by Matt Brown of the Londonist. He took the first known map of London from the 16th century, printed in black by the copperplate method and brought it to life. It is thought that originally the map consisted of 15 panels of which only three are known, nevertheless, the coloured detail represented here gives us some understanding of Tudor London.

From what was a pretty prosaic representation of the city, seen on many maps around that time, Matt has brought it into stunning focus, you can see how London looked before the Great Fire of London, and surprisingly how much of the original road network survived post the fire.

Featured image: Matt’s colouring of Moorfield, he has gone on to write about the project with far more images on London: Time Machine available on Substack.

English not spoken here

Transport for London has paused the English language test for Private Hire Drivers. This was a licensing requirement, but as a large number of Public Hire drivers were not passing the test, TfL has decided to pause this requirement. Imagine travelling to one of the world’s most popular capitals, and not being able to communicate with the driver in the language of that country. An incredible safety concern!

Johnson’s London Dictionary: London Clay

LONDON CLAY (n.) Dark brown deposit, which Londoners claim to be unique, despite geological evidence, much favoured in the manufacture of poor people’s houses.

Dr. Johnson’s London Dictionary for publick consumption in the twenty-first century avail yourself on Twitter @JohnsonsLondon

100 days to go

When you awoke today I’m betting your first thought wasn’t that you have only 100 days to decide who to vote for to run City Hall.

The main parties have already chosen their candidates, so I’ve been digging around their campaign websites to see what they’ve been saying on a variety of issues, as you’d expect transport, air pollution, housing, jobs and crime are all included.

So with a stubby pencil poised above my choice here’s what information I’ve managed to extract.

Sadiq Khan – Labour (1/6)

Khan claims that electing him for a record third time would be one in the eye for the Tories. He brags about his record on air pollution since the imposition of the popular Ulez; he warns us of the impending climate crisis after flying around the world; he claims reported crime is falling, although most now don’t both to inform the police; promoting housebuilding, which I can testify to as many car parks around here are now building sites; transport affordability (it’s cheap as chips apparently!); and the opening of the Elizabeth line after years of delays.

Susan Hall – Conservative (10/3)

Predictably Hall is keen to “sort out the mess” created by Khan, including stopping the Ulez after it’s cost us millions to set up, but that money won’t be wasted, word has it the cameras will be utilised for the police to spy on us; she does not want to see any construction of housing on the green belt so that cuts out obsolete rural petrol stations, and any derelict land being redeveloped; and that she will look to increase the number of low-rise family properties, rather than one or two bedrooms homes in high-rise blocks, just how without spreading out upon the green belt she doesn’t say.

Zoe Garbett – Green Party (66/1)

No surprise that Garbett pledges to make London a greener, fairer city with measures including free bus travel for young people (bugger the old as they’ve already decided to vote Tory); and cleaner ways to use Silvertown Tunnel, presumably turning it into the world’s largest underground cycle lane.

Rob Blackie Liberal Democrats – (66/1)

Anti-Brexiteer Blackie aims to tackle crime; keep London welcoming for European citizens and others who are “threatened by Home Office incompetence”, presumably to boost recruitment for the Met to tackle crime; and clean up London’s rivers, and there’s me thinking the £4.3bn Thames Tideway Tunnel aims to just achieve that.

Howard Cox – Reform UK (100/1)

A climate change sceptic, Cox promises to scrap Ulez completely, probably dumping the technology into landfill; cutting crime (could public flogging be on the cards?); build more houses, as climate change doesn’t exist let’s just chop down trees on the green belt; and he wants to “get the city moving” by scrapping low traffic neighbourhoods and 20mph zones, returning to the days of Brands Hatch wannabes outside primary schools.

There are several independents, most are not worth mentioning except one, who hasn’t thrown his hat in the ring.

Jeremy Corbyn – Independent (25/1)

As he hasn’t declared yet, so there’s no way of knowing what policies he’d announce. But one thing is for sure, it would split the Labour vote and keep the Red Flag flying above City Hall.

Featured image: Vote by Nick Youngson (CC BY-SA 3.0) Alpha Stock Images

Taxi Talk Without Tipping