[O]N FAIRFIELD ROAD, Bow stands the Bryant & May match factory, which in 1980s became one of the first industrial buildings in London to be converted into apartments when it was renamed the Bow Quarter.
In the summer of 1888 what happened in this building was to change the history of the labour movement.
The match girls working there were regarded as the lowest strata of society; long hours in appalling conditions, hired and fired at the will of the management, and its workers suffering dreadful industrial injuries.
Bryant & May was regarded at the time as a model employer, much the same as the Cadburys, a similar Quaker employer who built for their workers the Bourneville village.
The Bryant & May strike started when a Fabian journalist Annie Besant after having interviewed some of the match girls wrote a scathing article of their life working in the factory. Entitled ‘White Slavery in London’ Besant highlighted that shareholders’ dividends of 20 percent were achieved only by cutting their meager wages lower than 15 years previously.
The youngest of the women were so malnourished they still looked like children; the factory foreman would beat employees, and if they succumbed to an industrial injury they were sacked.
Far worse than those conditions were phossy jaw where toxic particles from white phosphorous used in the match heads entered the workers’ jawbones through the holes in their teeth.
Initially causing facial swelling eventually the jaw would decay with pieces of bone working through the suppurating abscesses. In the final stages, like lepers, they would live outside London as the smell from their decaying jaw became intolerable, before they succumbed to an agonising death.
Besant’s article shocked the Nation and prompted the match girls to strike – the first of its kind in the country – it the sowed the seeds for the establishment of the modern Labour Party and women’s rights when employed.
Questions were raised in the House by MPs. the Times published editorials shaming the previously unblemished reputation of Bryant & May, and socialite George Bernard Shaw among others voiced his support for them. The match girls even received death threats from someone claiming to be Jack the Ripper, whose reign of fear started some weeks later in East London.
Within two weeks their demands had been met and they returned to work, but it would be a century later before Bryant & May would acknowledge any wrongdoing on their part.
Just a year after the match girl’s victory thousands of the country’s most exploited workers would gain union recognition, the most famous being after the Dock Strike which began at short walk from Bryant & May’s factory in East London.
This year marks the 131st anniversary of the strike which became a pivotal point in the trade union movement and employees working conditions. As Louise Raw remarked when interviewed on the Robert Elms show recently, now is the time to unveil a Blue Plaque alongside the one dedicated to Annie Besant, to those brave and exploited girls who had the temerity to take on a powerful employer – and win.
A far more comprehensive history of the match girls strike can be found on Louise Raw’s website.
A version of this post was published by CabbieBlog on 23rd March 2012
3 thoughts on “A match made in Hell”
I know from experience that ‘you are always right’! I am intrigued but also baffled about the mention of ‘Jack the Ripper’ in your excellent article [As usual.] because the name ‘Jack the Ripper’ didn’t appear ‘officially’ until 29th September 1888 almost 3 months after the actual strike. I don’t ever recall ‘Jack the Ripper’ making threats to the ‘Match Girls’ AFTER 29th September 1888. Therefore, I am excited that you might be suggesting that the name ‘Jack the Ripper’ appeared in these threats BEFORE the end of September 1888 & that you quietly know something that nobody else does. Like Shylock in the MofV Act 1, Scene 3, “[I wait] with bated breath & whisp’ring humbleness.” for a revelation from you.
Regards from Colorado.
I’ve always maintained that my readers, remarkably, know more than me, and in so doing keep me on my toes. Your comment just proves that “I’m not always right”. My only excuse is that I wrote the piece many years ago and as explained in Anglia & Angst http://www.cabbieblog.com/anglia-angst/ I am padding out my twice-weekly posts with previously published pieces. Thanks for the comment.
Oh well, so no revelations. However to make you feel better your article of sometime ago relating to the chap ‘eating a lamb chop in the cafe’ in Autumn 1888 & confessing to be ‘Jack the Ripper’ stands alone as I have never heard it mentioned anywhere else but is very feasible especially when considered against the oodles of drivel out there proffering impossible suspects like Prince Albert etc. etc. etc.. Thanks again for the article & a few moments of excitement.