London Books Review: Up in Smoke

Ask Londoners of their favourite building and you’re likely to get a number of different answers: St. Paul’s, the Houses of Parliament or possibly the Shard. Define your question to enquiring of their favourite industrial building and you are more likely to get some kind of consensus.

Standing like a proud relic from London’s industrial past Battersea Power Station has mirrored the capital’s industrial decline.

[I]T HAS SLOWLY been dismantled and left to the elements by successively failed entrepreneurs while we watched the old lady fade into obscurity.

Prior to the advent of World War II, Battersea Power Station was regarded as one of three key institutions necessary for the running of the capital, alongside the Bank of England and Broadcasting House.

Since its closure on the evening of 25th January 1983 at 6.21 proposals to transform this much-loved landmark have been at times farcical: an English Disneyland, a casino, football stadium, giant cinema, home to a circus troupe, horse-racing track and even a religious theme park.

Now its history and destiny are examined by Peter Watts in his book – Up in Smoke: The failed dreams of Battersea Power Station.

With his name who better to chronicle the fortunes of an iconic electrical powerhouse, the site of which, could end up as a gated community for the super-rich.

In his book, Watts gives us some fascinating facts about the monolith sleeping on the Thames’ south foreshore.

The chimneys, its most notable feature, were cast by the inventors of the football net. When constructed its control room was literally a cathedral of power with the walls lined with Napoleon marble with switchgear in matching the colour and its operatives wore felt overshoes to protect the teak blocked flooring.

So necessary to London’s power was Battersea, that when a turbine fire necessitated the station’s shut down the launch of BBC2 was postponed until the following day.

Anecdotes fill this enjoyable book. I particularly liked the rumour that Michael Heseltine gave Battersea heritage listing to annoy Thatcher, said to loathe the building. Or Eddie The Eagle (now the subject of a movie) received £2,000 to mention the new ride at Alton Towers which at that time was owned by the developer of Battersea Power Station who wanted to build a similar theme park on the site.

It’s almost as if the old majestic building was defying any transformation into a commercial venture bankrupting a succession of developers. Work was even delayed in 2001 when the only breeding pair of peregrine falcons were discovered nesting in one of the chimneys.

Now it looks as if the site will become another ubiquitous riverside development, all be it with four chimneys poking out over the steel and glass ’executive’ properties and as Watts points out a one-bed studio flat sold off-plan in 2014 for £1.5 million was the same price the entire building and surrounding land was offered in 1984.

Rather than a dry chronological history, this is a hugely readable and well-researched book from Peter Watts and new publishers, Paradise Road, whose aim is to produce future books about London.

Up in Smoke: The failed dreams of Battersea Power Station by Peter Watts published 2016 by Paradise Road.

CabbieBlog-cabThis is not a sponsored post. The publication reviewed has been purchased independently by CabbieBlog who has not received payment for writing this review. The opinions expressed are solely his own.

4 thoughts on “London Books Review: Up in Smoke”

    1. That sounds like the beginning of a bad joke. All I know is that the blue plaques are the official ones.


    2. I like seeing plaques of all descriptions. Only problem it’s more to seek out when on The Knowledge. I remember spending an inordinate amount of time looking for Frankie Howerd’s plaque – 27 Edwardes Square if you want to know.


  1. The “official” blue plaques are English Heritage plaques. They have strict regulations for their deployment, ie the person must be dead for a certain number of years and the building that person lived in must still be standing. All other plaques, such as the green ones and certain blue ones (Peter Tatchell etc) are not English heritage but may be local boroughs or independent organisations. Such plaques have recently been villified for demeaning the original purpose of the blue plaques.
    Personally, the more plaques the merrier. It’s all history. I just don’t see the reason why all the other bodies want to jump on the English Heritage bandwagon. Keep them green, red, white, rainbow coloured etc but leave blue for English Heritage.


What do you have to say for yourself?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s